[Bug 1668646] Review Request: R-gsl - Wrapper for the Gnu Scientific Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668646

José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |jamatos@xxxxxxxx
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |jamatos@xxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> ---
The package is simple. :-)

The license is GPLv2+ and so is acceptable.

fedora-review complains:

- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :doc, DESCRIPTION,
  CITATION
- Package requires R-core.

I suspect that CITATION probably is required as non-doc to avoid those cases
where you install without docs.
In any case I consider this to be an esoteric issue. :-)

The next claim is useless "Package requires R-core." since as it can be seen
the package requires libR.so()... that in turn requires R-core.

So with all that said the package is approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux