https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479 --- Comment #7 from Felix Schwarz <fschwarz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I rebuilt your updated hcc package on Fedora 29 which worked fine. The resulting "hcc" binary seems to work. I was able to run "saxpy" and several example programs from https://github.com/ROCm-Developer-Tools/HCC-Example-Application . Just for reference: I'm able to run the "saxpy" example from https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/hcc/wiki#how-to-use-hcc when invoking hcc like this: hcc `hcc-config --cxxflags --ldflags` -I/usr/include/hcc saxpy.cpp -o saxpy I noticed some things: The hcc package contains multiple copies of the same header file, e.g. kalmar_aligned_alloc.h is available via /usr/include/ and /usr/include/hcc/. I saw a patch in the SRPM which tried to move everything to the "hcc" subdirectory but I guess you missed at least on spot. Also there are some rpmlint errors (which I guess you are aware of already), e.g. that "hcc" requires "hcc-runtime-devel". As hcc is a compiler I think that is basically ok (compiler requires header files for its "standard library") but maybe these files are just part of the "hcc-runtime"? rpmlint also complained about some rpaths in binaries like hcc and libraries like "LLVMPromotePointerKernArgsToGlobal.so". "hcc-config --cxxflags" still returns "-I/opt/rocm/include" but lacks "-I/usr/include/hcc/". Same applies to "clamp-config" (and I was wondering why "clamp-config" was available at all as I read that ROCm 2.0 drop C++ AMP support - but that is likely due to my limited understanding/an upstream issue). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
