https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666844 Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED External Bug ID| |CPAN 43597 Blocks| |182235 (FE-Legal) Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review- Last Closed| |2019-01-18 14:16:58 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- The standalone and in-SRPM spec file differ. It's a only a white space change. I will use the standalone for this review. Url and Source archive addresses are Ok. Source0 archive (SHA-256: 246fb31669764e78336b2191134122e07c44f2d82dc4f37d552ab28f8668bed3) is original. Ok. Summary is Ok. TODO: Spell "Cpio" as "cpio" in the summary. FATAL: The source code does not provide neither declare any license. Upstream bug tracker knows that <https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=43597>. There is an answer from a person signed as <tmp@xxxxxxxx>, but this is neither current PIXEL's address <https://metacpan.org/author/PIXEL> (<tmp@xxxxxxxxxx>) who uploaded the archive to CPAN nor the code author listed in Makefile.PL (Pixel <pixel@xxxxxxxxxx>). I was able to find a CPAN author index from 2005 year <http://www.mit.edu/afs.new/athena/contrib/perl5/src/CPAN/sources/authors/01mailrc.txt.gz> that lists PIXEL as "Pascal Rigaux <tmp@xxxxxxxx>". But I believe Fedora needs something more material. E.g. an explicit e-mail from <pixel@xxxxxxxxxx> or any public statement signed as "Pascal Rigaux". Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
