https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658199 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Bauer <zonexpertconsulting@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #13) > I disagree. This package has been in Fedora with Epoch 5, so it should never > be reintroduced with a lower (or no) Epoch. People do skip releases when > upgrading, or even keep the package from the EOL release if the newer > release no longer provides it but does not force its removal (either > deliberately because they still need the package, or accidentally because > they just forgot about it – and for the record, I am absolutely against > forced obsoletion of retired packages as long as they still work because > people may want to keep them deliberately). By dropping the Epoch, you break > the upgrade path for the people who still have the F23 or pre-F24-Rawhide > package installed for whatever reason, so they may end up still sticking > with the obsolete package. Good argument. I have placed Epoch back into the specfile. Updated Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/knight-of-ni/specfiles/master/netatalk.spec Updated SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kni/netatalk/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00845958-netatalk/netatalk-3.1.12-1.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
