https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 Petr Viktorin <pviktori@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(christof@damian.n | |et) | |needinfo?(tuanta@iwayvietna | |m.com) | |needinfo?(pviktori@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #20 from Petr Viktorin <pviktori@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hello, and apologies for the delay. If the progressbar and progressbar2 upstreams diverge, we'll be in quite a tough spot. But for now, it seems progressbar2 is better maintained, and wants to keep compatibility with the original. So, let's replace python3-progressbar by python3-progressbar2. The python2 package is going away soon though; let's keep that as it is. Ankur, if it works for you, can you: - post a heads-up to Fedora-devel, CCing maintainers of the dependent packages and the other progressbar admins (tuanta, cdamian), saying what the plan is - remove the python2-progressbar2 subpackage entirely from the spec (this should simplify it quite a bit!) - make python3-progressbar2 replace python3-progressbar (using versioned Obsoletes & Provides) - get it approved - please, add me as a co-maintainer - let me know so I can remove the python3-progressbar package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
