https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519834 --- Comment #3 from david08741@xxxxxxxxx --- I fixed the setup-not-quite warning. By now BOUT++ has also a python interface, which is packaged for python3. A debug package is built, as support for shared objects was added. The new rpmlint warnings are: $ rpmlint bout++.spec noarch/* x86_64/* bout++.spec:88: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(libpvode) bout++.spec:139: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(libpvode) bout++-common.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US curvilinear -> rectilinear bout++-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US curvilinear -> rectilinear bout++-doc.noarch: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bout++.1.gz 5043: normal or special character expected (got a space) bout++-doc.noarch: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bout++.1.gz 5097: warning: numeric expression expected (got `o') bout++-doc.noarch: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bout++.1.gz 5194: warning: numeric expression expected (got `r') bout++-doc.noarch: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bout++.1.gz 5200: warning: numeric expression expected (got `r') bout++-doc.noarch: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bout++.1.gz 5261: warning: numeric expression expected (got `r') [...] bout++-doc.noarch: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bout++.1.gz 35289: warning: numeric expression expected (got `\e') bout++-doc.noarch: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bout++.1.gz 46583: `m' is an invalid argument to \O bout++-doc.noarch: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bout++.1.gz 59851: warning: numeric expression expected (got `g') bout++-doc.noarch: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bout++.1.gz 59852: warning: numeric expression expected (got `g') bout++-doc.noarch: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bout++.1.gz 59857: warning: numeric expression expected (got `g') bout++-doc.noarch: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bout++.1.gz 59857: warning: numeric expression expected (got `g') python3-bout++.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre -> per, ore, pee python3-bout++.noarch: W: no-documentation bout++-mpich.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US curvilinear -> rectilinear bout++-mpich.x86_64: W: no-documentation bout++-mpich-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US curvilinear -> rectilinear bout++-mpich-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib bout++-mpich-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation bout++-openmpi.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US curvilinear -> rectilinear bout++-openmpi.x86_64: W: no-documentation bout++-openmpi-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US curvilinear -> rectilinear bout++-openmpi-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib bout++-openmpi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation python3-bout++-mpich.x86_64: W: no-documentation python3-bout++-openmpi.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mpich -> chimp python3-bout++-openmpi.x86_64: W: no-documentation 15 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 186 warnings. I am uncertain about the man page warnings - I don't think it is worth fixing them, as the man page is generated by sphinx. Is it better to not shop the man page, or ship a potentially broken one? More troublesome to me seems the fact that I cannot find and open the man page after installing the rpm with dnf. If I download with dnf, and install with rpm, the man page is available. Any ideas why that might be happening? BOUT++ comes with libpvode - I would like to ship the bundled upstream version to give the same results as the upstream code. From [1] it seems ok to bundle. BOUT++ can be build with more recent versions, but they are not packaged. The only-non-binary-in-usr-lib is due to mpi - the specific header files are located in the mpi folders. The rawhide build fails on copr, but is fine with koji scratch builds. I was also unable to reproduce this issue locally with mock or a container. Not sure why there are illegal instructions. Updated Spec: https://github.com/dschwoerer/bout-spec/raw/master/bout%2B%2B.spec New Builds: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/davidsch/bout/build/833821/ [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
