https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645913 --- Comment #11 from Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc@xxxxxxxxx> --- I think this is where the problem is - %package libs Summary: Libraries for %{name} Obsoletes: LuxRender-lib < 2.0 Provides: LuxRender-lib = 2.0 %description libs The %{name}-libs package contains shared library for %{name}. %package core Summary: Core binaries for %{name} Requires: %{name}-lib%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: LuxRender-core < 2.0 Provides: LuxRender-core = 2.0 Provides in the -libs package does not match the requires in core package. This needs fixing. and this, - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages ---> devel package .so is unversioned. Why? Last two issues (assuming rpmlint does not complain). Sorry for the delay. I should be able to move quicker now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
