https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649574 --- Comment #8 from Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #7) > Right, sorry I wasn't clear. I didn't mean to suggest copy and pasting the > SPDX list, but only following the list with the appropriate names. > > Fedora recommendations for multiple licenses are: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: > LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios OK, thanks! Going by this it appears the spec section should probably look something like this: License: EPL-2.0 and BSD and GPLv2 with exceptions On the other hand, I've only came across "Eclipse Distribution License v1.0" (a.k.a BSD) in Java source files in jaf. Are there files explicitly referencing something else? If not, it would make sense to add a comment that the license field is the way it is, because the source is made available under multiple licenses. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
