https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592952 Dmitri Smirnov <cserpentis@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(cserpentis@gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #15 from Dmitri Smirnov <cserpentis@xxxxxxxxx> --- Since upstream has released a new version and a name of the tarball has been more consistent with previous version, I've changed the name of spec file. I'm also currently not sure whether it makes more sense to update existing package (as subpackages conflict with qdigidoc version 3 anyways and both cannot be installed in parallel and it seems like developers intend it this way and want v4 to replace v3). Please suggest on what way to proceed would make most sense? Anyways, new spec and SRPM for qdigidoc-4.1.0: Spec URL: https://pagure.io/digidoc4-client/blob/master/f/qdigidoc4.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/cserpentis/open-eid/fedora-29-x86_64/00826752-qdigidoc4/qdigidoc4-4.1.0-1.fc29.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
