https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645172 --- Comment #19 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to dan.cermak from comment #18) > (In reply to Ondrej Dubaj from comment #13) > > > > Mail to upstream according to license is sent, waiting for approval. > > There would be one advantage with keeping the license at GPLv2: upstream > could easier reuse this spec file (albeit MIT licensed shouldn't be a > problem). MIT is more flexible - that's why I see it to be better in this case. Upstream could take the final spec under MIT and re-release it under GPLv2+ without any legal problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
