https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645172 --- Comment #12 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #11) > (In reply to Ondrej Dubaj from comment #10) > > Is it then OK just to leave a comment? Or it should be better to ask > > upstream? > > > AFAIK (feel free to correct me if I am wrong) Fedora specs could be licensed > under any Fedora compatible license. So probably OK to just leave there > comment about the license. But if you don't want to pollute spec with such > comments, you can ask upstream. Email to the maintainer or ticket @ github > should work. I don't see any reason why they shouldn't approve it. > > > I probbaly do not understand, how could I package something that does not > > exist in my buildroot? > > You need to call 'move' in the %install phase to correct the path after the > %make_install. mv OLDPATH NEWPAH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx