[Bug 1645172] Review Request: firejail - Linux namespaces sandbox program

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645172



--- Comment #12 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #11)
> (In reply to Ondrej Dubaj from comment #10)
> > Is it then OK just to leave a comment? Or it should be better to ask
> > upstream?
> > 
> AFAIK (feel free to correct me if I am wrong) Fedora specs could be licensed
> under any Fedora compatible license. So probably OK to just leave there
> comment about the license. But if you don't want to pollute spec with such
> comments, you can ask upstream. Email to the maintainer or ticket @ github
> should work. I don't see any reason why they shouldn't approve it.
> 
> > I probbaly do not understand, how could I package something that does not
> > exist in my buildroot?
> 
> You need to call 'move' in the %install phase to correct the path after the
> %make_install.

mv OLDPATH NEWPAH

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux