https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 Petr Viktorin <pviktori@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(pviktori@redhat.c | |om) | |needinfo?(christof@damian.n | |et) | |needinfo?(tuanta@iwayvietna | |m.com) | --- Comment #6 from Petr Viktorin <pviktori@xxxxxxxxxx> --- The choice of naming the library differently than the imported module is really unfortunate, especially if the author knew a "progressbar" library already exists. The two cannot be installed simultaneously. Progressbar 2 looks more featureful and tested, but progressbar is used by other packages (and probably users) in Fedora, so we need to be careful. Can you get upstreams of Fedora packages that currently need progressbar to switch to progressbar2? Those are euca2ools, libtaskotron and python-bitmath, AFAICS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
