https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848 --- Comment #14 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #13) > The license field should be CC0. The website links to Creative Commons Zero > 1.0 Universal. Hrm, but he goes "This work is released into the Public Domain.", and the link there goes to a "retired license": https://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/. This is not the CC0 universal license which is here: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode CC0 etc are also content licenses Isn't it OK to use Public Domain here, since that is the intention of the author? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
