https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542 --- Comment #38 from Jamie Mansfield <jamie.mansfield.jm@xxxxxxxxx> --- I've been working on getting Hack packaged in a satisfactory manor (I hope), its not 100% working yet - trouble at the last step (always the way -_-). My solution to the lack of a 'fontmake' package, is to grab the dependencies from pip (in a virtual environment). This can easily be swapped out for the proper 'fontmake' package when the time comes. This isn't a perfect solution, but it does solve the issue of compiling the font ourselves - input on this would be appreciated :) Hopefully we can get this into the repository swiftly. On a final note, I haven't based this work of the original spec presented in this issue (I'd already begun working on my own) - looking at the original, there does seem to be some outstanding issues with it that are resolved by mine: - The source URL seems be be wrong on the original, referring to an old version (perhaps GitHub allows such dodgy usage) - Some of the metadata seems to be filled in wrong, specifically with regards to the licensing Repository: https://pagure.io/hack-fonts SPEC File: https://pagure.io/hack-fonts/raw/master/f/hack-fonts.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
