[Bug 1643924] Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML - HTML color names and equivalent RGB values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643924

Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
URL and Source0 addresses are Ok.
Source archive (SHA-256:
c977d7e5424a3ce3cf28509b93422cb9df2872faaa3225afbe470537a0747bd9) is original.
Ok.
Summary verified from lib/Graphics/ColorNames/HTML.pm. Ok.
Description verified from lib/Graphics/ColorNames/HTML.pm. Ok.
License verified from lib/Graphics/ColorNames/HTML.pm, LICENSE, and README.md.
Ok.
No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok.
CPAN::Meta and CPAN::Meta::Prereqs build-dependencies are not helpful. Ok.
Test::CleanNamespaces, Test::EOL, Test::Fixme, Test::NoTabs,
Test::Perl::Critic, Test::Pod are not used. Ok.

TODO: Unset AUTHOR_TESTING and RELEASE_TESTING environment variables before
executing "make test" to be sure the tests won't fail on a missing
dependencies.

FIX: Do not build-require perl(Graphics::ColorNames)? It's nowhere used.

All tests pass. Ok.

$ rpmlint perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML.spec
../SRPMS/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML-3.3.1-1.fc30.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML-3.3.1-1.fc30.noarch.rpm 
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint is Ok.

$ rpm -q -lv -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML-3.3.1-1.fc30.noarch.rpm 
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 Oct 30 13:49
/usr/share/doc/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                      287 Oct 21 18:08
/usr/share/doc/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML/Changes
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                     1877 Oct 21 18:08
/usr/share/doc/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML/README.md
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 Oct 30 13:49
/usr/share/licenses/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                     7431 Oct 21 18:08
/usr/share/licenses/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML/LICENSE
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                     1950 Oct 30 13:49
/usr/share/man/man3/Graphics::ColorNames::HTML.3pm.gz
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 Oct 30 13:49
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Graphics
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 Oct 30 13:49
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Graphics/ColorNames
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                     2557 Oct 21 18:08
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Graphics/ColorNames/HTML.pm
File permissions and layout is Ok.

$ rpm -q --requires -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML-3.3.1-1.fc30.noarch.rpm | sort -f
| uniq -c
      1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.0)
      1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.6.0
      1 perl(Graphics::ColorNames)
      1 perl(integer)
      1 perl(strict)
      1 perl(warnings)
      1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
      1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
      1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
      1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

TODO: What's the point in hard-requiring perl(Graphics::ColorNames)? Either use
Recommends as recommended by the upstream (META.json:44) or Suggests or remove
it completely because sole installation of the module does brings any benefit
(it's not optionally used from perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML code at all).

$ rpm -q --provides -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML-3.3.1-1.fc30.noarch.rpm | sort -f
| uniq -c
      1 perl(Graphics::ColorNames::HTML) = 3.3.1
      1 perl-Graphics-ColorNames-HTML = 3.3.1-1.fc30
Binary provides are Ok.

The package builds in F30
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30558051). Ok.

Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines.

Please correct the `FIX' item and consider fixing `TODO' items before building
this package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux