https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638994 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@xxxxxxxxxx> --- In RHEL there are subpackages which include Python2 modules for OpenMPI and MPICH: %files openmpi-python %defattr(-, root, root, -) %doc LICENSE_1_0.txt %{_libdir}/openmpi/lib/libboost_mpi_python*.so.%{sonamever} %{_libdir}/openmpi/lib/mpi.so %files mpich-python %defattr(-, root, root, -) %doc LICENSE_1_0.txt %{_libdir}/mpich/lib/libboost_mpi_python*.so.%{sonamever} %{_libdir}/mpich/lib/mpi.so This EPEL package doesn't provide Did you decide not to provide Python3 versions of those for EPEL, or was that unintentional? Packaging them for RHEL 7 might be complicated, because the python2 and python3 modules can't both live at the same path: %{_libdir}/mpich/lib/mpi.so In Fedora they are installed to different locations, via the sitearch macros: %files mpich-python2 %license LICENSE_1_0.txt %{_libdir}/mpich/lib/libboost_mpi_python.so.%{sonamever} %{python2_sitearch}/mpich/boost/ %files mpich-python3 %license LICENSE_1_0.txt %{_libdir}/mpich/lib/libboost_mpi_python3.so.%{sonamever} %{python3_sitearch}/mpich/boost/ For EPEL it might be best to just ignore the MPI modules until somebody needs them (which is what your spec file does now). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
