https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565848 --- Comment #20 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to dan.cermak from comment #19) > Thanks for the extensive review, I have tried to address most of the issues > and pushed the new version to pagure > (https://pagure.io/Bear_rpm/blob/master/f/bear.spec) and copr > (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/defolos/devel/). > > However, concerning this: > > > - Use a more meaningful name for your package: > > I'd prefer not to change the package's name, as it is widely known as bear > (it is recommended frequently when working with clang-tooling) and most > other distribution package it under its upstream name. I'm only talking about the archive name, instead of %{version}.tar.gz use %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz. It it less ambiguous. - Use a more meaningful name for your archive: Source: %{URL}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
