https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638824 --- Comment #10 from Luis Segundo <luis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Casper Meijn from comment #9) > The "LICENSE.txt" is not the license under which we want to use the > software. Is it then still necessary to include it? I understand, if the license does not apply, it can be removed. > I replaced %{_datarootdir} by %{_datadir}. Nice! please check this last issue Issues: ======= - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file license.cpp is not marked as %license See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
