Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292331 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2007-09-17 16:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Typo in the "amb-plugins" Provides: > This will be fixed in the imported version > Suggesting you replace 'I use' with 'to use' in the %description Idem > > With the Provides in the Obsoletes/Provides pair you practically > occupy the "amb-plugins" namespace. Is this really necessary > to keep both package names when this is a new-entry in Fedora? > The obsoletes is necessary because it used to be called amb-plugins in somewhat older but not very old CCRMA releases, the provides is there as upstream's name is amb-plugins and thus IMHO yum install amb-plugins should work too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review