https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #99 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> --- I will let the task to sort out what works and does not with this particular implementation on the gstreamer side, as only gstreamer will consume this library within Fedora as I expect. For the packaging side, I confirm that having a fdk-aac-free package with the current upstream SONAME unmodified in fedora is acceptable. Even having a virtual provides for fdk-aac (but no obsoletes). That's a compromise to avoid breaking our non-replacement policy (that others third part repositories don't follow). Along with not having existing end-users package replaced by a less featured version. Please keep in mind that as soon as RPM Fusion is concerned, we may NOT test if the Fedora library is at the same version as the RPM Fusion one, we may update the package according to the Fedora updates policy, so any future ABI changes will have to be taken into account on the Fedora side in the appropriate timing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
