Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-15 21:36 EST ------- Well, spot has apparently cleared the multicol license upon rereading, see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00017.html This leaves: * Literat license - what's up with that one? Should the affected files just be removed? * AFPL font files: already removed upstream as per: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00030.html (they're just old versions of the GPLed GhostScript fonts) but need to be removed downstream (in the Fedora package) too if there isn't yet any new release tarball from upstream without these. * The 2 files (fancybox.sty and pcatcode.sty) under Artistic v1. Spot: Does texlive really have to be blocked for this one? Considering these are both already in the existing tetex packages, keeping texlive on hold won't actually fix the problem. Plus, there are still other packages with Artistic v1 files in them too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review