[Bug 1628148] Review Request: psftools - Conversion tools for .PSF fonts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628148



--- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> ---
Thanks for the review.

(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
>  - Group: is not used in Fedora

Dropped.

>  - make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build
> 
>  - Tell upstream to fix the FSF adress in:
> 
> psftools.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/share/licenses/psftools/COPYING

Done

(In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #2)
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> >  - make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build
> 
> Why?

(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
> That's not mandatory, it's for consistency sake.

I'm leaving it as it is. Most packages I've seen use the former one, and thus
it's perhaps the more consistent form. Also, the packaging guidelines seem to
use that form in examples, and so does Vim's SPEC file template.

Updated version:

SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/psftools.spec
SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/psftools-1.0.10-2.fc28.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux