https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #97 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Wim Taymans from comment #95) ... > Can you re-approve the bug again? Once again. I would not approve this unless the package is named fdk-aac-free to denote the incompleteness of the library (possibly with a virtual provide fdk-aac). If that can be done, both fedora fdk-aac-free and rpmfusion fdk-aac-free would use a normal packaging method. (and they would conflicts). For users, it would only be a matter to replace the former with the latter. But you need to provide a bug-free fdk-aac implementation. It's not at all acceptable that have unfixable items on the fedora side that would only be fixed by using the fully implemented version. Please also reminds that rpmfusion has version 1.6 since fc28 and I don't see that would have updated the fedora counterpart in time. This is a problem for us. To me, it means there is a need for a new legal review for each library update. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
