Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael@xxxxxxx 2007-09-14 06:53 EST ------- > I use -j3 (dualcore Xeon) and it works_for_me(tm) - > do you have any idea why the error happens? I am not > a programmer, it would take me ages to figure it > out (especially when I cannot reproduce) :-( You would simply drop the %{_smp_mflags} from the spec, add a comment in the same line and be done. However, if you believe it builds fine *always*, keep the SMP make flags and expect the unexpected. Keep it until it breaks. ;) > - should I rename the library somehow and make a symlink > at the end of %install? That won't help at all, since it doesn't change the SONAME of the library, and plugins would still depend on that SONAME. It's solely a matter of API/ABI stability of libqmmp.so -- stuff that is linked against libqmmp.so requires a specific interface version of the lib, not *any* libqmmp.so. Sooner or later there may be additional plugin packages which would be built for a specific version of libqmmp, and if that is not reflected in a properly versioned library soname dependency, it is up to the packagers to hardcode versions as "Requires" in their packages manually and avoid that an upgrade of qmmp breaks plugin pkgs by changing libqmmp in incompatible ways. Don't worry yet, just be aware of the implications of a version-less soname in run-time linker's search path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review