Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 ------- Additional Comments From gauret@xxxxxxx 2007-09-13 17:33 EST ------- I was wondering about whether to rename qca 1.x to compat-qca or to add qca 2.x as qca2. Renaming to compat-qca would force me to update the buildrequires in depending packages, so I'd rather go with qca2, but I don't have any real preference. Is there some kind of "best practice" about that ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review