[Bug 289681] Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681





------- Additional Comments From rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-09-13 15:58 EST -------
initial comments
0. naming.  Since this is a qt4 addon, maybe qt4-qca?  This would only make 
sense if the existing qca were (re)named qt-qca.  Else qca, qca2 worksforme 
too. :)

1.  configure.  I suggest using instead:
unset QTDIR

./configure \
  --prefix=%{_prefix} \
  --includedir=%{_includedir} \
  --libdir=%{_libdir} \
  --datadir=%{_datadir} \
  --no-separate-debug-info \
  --verbose

Use of --no-separate-debug-info allows one to not have to mess with 
omitting/excluding lib*.debug files later).

If you want qca2 to be installed into the same place(s) as qt4, use macros 
_qt4_prefix, _qt4_includedir, _qt4_libdir, _qt4_datadir instead, but I don't 
think this is needed, as long as there are no conflicts between qca(1) and 
qca2.

2. --certstore-path should probably be set to something under /etc/pki/...



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]