https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607554 --- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Justin M. Forbes from comment #5) > Actually, it wouldn't really. And there are other advantages to not updating > headers with every single kernel build. The headers packages are required by > a lot of container type images where the kernel itself is not, and they > would not need to upgrade as often. There are few times where it is > critical that they are in sync. If it were always, userspace built against > an older kernel would quit working when we rebase. Kernel tools is more > likely to break, but we build on rawhide when we get a new RC, and on stable > updates only when there were patches to the tools source. We will follow a > similar path for kernel-headers Wouldn't this negatively impact kernel module builds, though? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/CLYXM2RK3U2VNNYGXD4MB2V5RQYPNMBK/
