https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1608401 Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- * Spec is nice and clean - I'd recommend using the new %pypi_source macro but that's at your option - I'd also recommend including the CHANGES.txt in the %doc (though looking at the MANIFEST.in I'm not sure upstream ships it in their tarball) - I'd recommend asking upstream to include their LICENSE.txt file so it can be flagged in the spec file * Builds fine in all arches: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28595642 * License is valid and correct * Basic test of the code shows no error: >>> import pyperclip >>> pyperclip.copy('foo') >>> pyperclip.paste() 'foo' APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/AMJAWN4VQEW63ROTVKYEVINDK2CJJDU3/
