https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607554 --- Comment #5 from Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Actually, it wouldn't really. And there are other advantages to not updating headers with every single kernel build. The headers packages are required by a lot of container type images where the kernel itself is not, and they would not need to upgrade as often. There are few times where it is critical that they are in sync. If it were always, userspace built against an older kernel would quit working when we rebase. Kernel tools is more likely to break, but we build on rawhide when we get a new RC, and on stable updates only when there were patches to the tools source. We will follow a similar path for kernel-headers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/YLYTZ7IMEN26M4RJWAAZDN534MEJRL2I/
