https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576413 --- Comment #36 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Marian Csontos from comment #35) > We must be looking at different yum.spec files, as the one I have opened has > everything in the package %{name}.lang, including %config, launcher, and > python modules. > > I think dnf is the closest to what you have proposed and fitting boom, but > IMHO that split is partially driven by having support for both python2 and > python3, and in our case does not make that much sense. > > Also main package in dnf is only the launcher (and man page and > bash-completion), this requiring either python2 or python3 module, and both > those modules require the common conf subpackage - so conf is required by > python module, and not the other way. > > May be antipattern was not the best choice. But in this case that pattern > does not fit - the configuration is required by python module, so should be > either included, or python module should require the configuration > subpackage, just like dnf does. > > Big thanks for all your time! I just think that it's "surprising" for people and they're not likely to find the boom boot manager if it's called "python3-boom". Our rules say python modules that other people are supposed to be able to use should be `python3-<foo>`, but they are specifically silent on what you should do with the rest of it. Whatever... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/3MV3SF6SNCNSRPQ5GN2OTKFMT5WVNDJ3/
