[Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: texi2html


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226487





------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx  2007-09-11 05:17 EST -------
I add this here since it was discussed above.

I just commited changes in texi2html cvs (no need to backport,
will be in the next release), to fix handling of @math, 
and it happens that with latex2html, the result cannot be
correct, since mixing of @-commands and tex commands is
allowed in @math, so something like
@math{@var{\phi}} is right, but badly interpreted by latex2html,
while with tex4ht the result is now right (since it now uses 
httexi for @math and httex for @tex). In my opinion this is 
a good reason to have a tex4ht dependency. What is your advice?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]