Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-09-11 05:17 EST ------- I add this here since it was discussed above. I just commited changes in texi2html cvs (no need to backport, will be in the next release), to fix handling of @math, and it happens that with latex2html, the result cannot be correct, since mixing of @-commands and tex commands is allowed in @math, so something like @math{@var{\phi}} is right, but badly interpreted by latex2html, while with tex4ht the result is now right (since it now uses httexi for @math and httex for @tex). In my opinion this is a good reason to have a tex4ht dependency. What is your advice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review