https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573634 --- Comment #14 from William Moreno <williamjmorenor@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Georg Sauthoff from comment #11) > Ok, I've just commented in an existing issue (about the missing license > file) in the upstream bug tracker. The author considers adding a license > file for the next release. > > The missing license file isn't a blocker for going forward with the current > version, right? Upstream uses proper License headers in the source code (this mean there is a note in the top of all .py files with a note about the LGPLv3 License), so it is clear the License of the source code and do not block this. But LGPLv3 requires that you must include a copy of the text of the license with the source code you are releasing, more info about that here: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/LTX67YWJFWPHFJAQNGZAP6QPPWM522NI/
