Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx) ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-11 04:36 EST ------- Just confirming Ewan's statement, we'll stay with "gimp-<foo>" where the package is only an extension of GIMP. Packages that have other functionality usable without GIMP can name their plugin subpackages "<foo>-gimp". If we at some point see that this results in a naming chaos, we'll revisit this issue. Xavier, my question was rather if Ewan is good to go forward with this package, i.e. if it reviews successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review