https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586117 --- Comment #3 from Frik Botha <frederick.botha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thank you very much for the review. I adapted the spec according to your recommendations. You can view it here: SPEC: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/netronome/virtio-forwarder/fedora-27-x86_64/00775197-virtio-forwarder/virtio-forwarder.spec SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/netronome/virtio-forwarder/fedora-27-x86_64/00775197-virtio-forwarder/virtio-forwarder-1.1.99.19-1.fc27.src.rpm Koji rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28091693 For now I have left the Source0 entry as-is. These packages map to upstream commits rather than tags, so I do not have a corresponding archive there. Do you know of alternatives that would work? I could add steps to generate it from the specific commit hash, but I'm not sure whether that would be acceptable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/OKHWEELO2ZZERM6E2SDBIW5BLYTVGPDF/
