Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-09-11 04:02 EST ------- For redhat-logos, the latest version I found that was in redhat 8 (no redhat 9 on rpmbones), it was redhat-logos-1.1.6. Maybe obsoleting < 1.2.0 could be right and then providing 1.2.0. So I'll propose: Obsoletes: redhat-logos < 1.2.0 Provides: redhat-logos = 1.2.0 Unversionned obsolete is always bad since it prevents others to provide a package with the same name (here there is a trademark issue, though, but still it would be better). What about my comment: * Maybe the version should be set to 6.0.98 to match the fedora-logos version. Otherwise it cannot be installed along with a recent redhat-artwork. Are you sure that Conflicts: kdebase <= 3.1.5 Conflicts: anaconda-images <= 10 Conflicts: redhat-artwork <= 5.0.5 is right? I checked on rpmbones that none of them had the file which is also in that package. So in my opinion removing those obsoletes would be cleaner. All the other rpmlint issues seem ok to me. Regarding the license, I am a bit unsure about it. is it really 'All rights reserved.'? Does it mean that it cannot be redistributed at all? Is it really a restrictive license, or is there only a trademark? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review