https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594313 --- Comment #37 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- jdk11 havebeen forked. > > It's been suggested that http://hg.openjdk.java.net/shenandoah/jdk is the > Shenandoah dev forest and we should not be using it. We should be using > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/shenandoah/jdk11 once jdk/jdk11 has been forked. > Either way, we'll be changing sources in an update: > > jdk/jdk => jdk/jdk11 > > or > > jdk/jdk => shenandoah/jdk11 Shenadoah was not. I guess it will anytime soon. Once forked, is it ok enough tobe used? > > We should just use jdk/jdk now for all arches and move to shenandoah/jdk11 > once it exists. > > There shouldn't be any shenandoah specific things in the spec file as far as > I understand it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/MFT527L757UP3DGFAN6VD64H5PPSAPLO/
