https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597287 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Dieter <jdieter@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #5) > So the licensing is complicated here: > * It should be BSD and MIT and Public Domain > * Provides: bundled(buzhash) = VERSION OF BUZHASH I had to modify the original code, so it can't really be unbundled. I'll go ahead and add the provides. > There seems to be some bundled code about multipart parsing... There was, but it didn't do what I needed, so I had to start from scratch. I obviously forgot to delete the original README.md, so I'll take care of that > * Provides: bundled(something) = VERSION OF THIS SOMETHING > * Provides: bundled(sha1) = … > * Provides: bundled(sha2) = … > > But please, can you unbundle those? These were bundled to keep dependencies at a minimum because I see zchunk as having universal use, even in places where openssl might not be available. Having said that, if you feel strongly about this, I will change zchunk so openssl is an optional dependency, that, if available, will provide the hashing functions rather than the built-in hashing functions. Do you feel that that would be worth the effort? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/CWHSD47G5UPC3VKJZO5MV6DA22HAPKYN/
