[Bug 1594313] Review Request: java-11-openjdk - next LTS OpenJDK for Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594313



--- Comment #5 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #3)
> Source0:  jdk-jdk-jdk-%{majorver}+%{buildver}.tar.xz
> Source1: jdk-shenandoah-jdk-ac148db384ee.tar.xz
> Source8: systemtap-tapset-3.6.0pre02.tar.xz
> 
> Each of these sources should have a comment preceding them how *exactly* the
> tarball was generated. I've been asked before by other fedora contributors
> how our sources are generated. When being asked I mostly don't remember
> myself and need to go digging. If every source was preceded by a comment
> where it came from those issues go away. Example:
> 
> # Generated by:
> #  $ VERSION="jdk-11+19" PROJECT_NAME=jdk REPO_NAME=jdk bash

This kind of comment should not be necessary.  Those valueas are exactly for
this purpose hardcoded in update_package.sh

> generate_source_tarball.sh
> Source0:  jdk-jdk-jdk-%{majorver}+%{buildver}.tar.xz
> [...]

Still I agree on improvement here. TBD!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/EX6HMRJ4YN3R7BEIOZYPDK2S2OTIR5TQ/




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux