[Bug 1592952] Review Request: digidoc4-client - Application for digitally signing and encrypting documents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592952



--- Comment #7 from Dmitri Smirnov <cserpentis@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Germano Massullo from comment #6)
> *** I have not officially taken the review ***
> 
> 1) Spec file name must be: digidoc4-client.spec

As I've indicated in the first comment #2 - I cannot change the description, so
the move I've made is not reflected in the initial description of the ticket. 

Should I re-create the review request with fixed links?

Also, the SHA256 of the sources tarball will not match with upstream, as
released version does not include git submodules which prevents it from being
built, so sources tarball is pulled from upstream git with --recursive flag.
There is a bug opened upstream to fix it
(https://github.com/open-eid/DigiDoc4-Client/issues/259)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/Y22WOB4DF3OU25HP5B6GG5EYUA6E47JZ/




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux