[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138



--- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Pavel Zhukov from comment #4)
> (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #3)
> 
> > I can fix them on commit.
> OK.
> > 
> > Well they're all development API docs as opposed to generic docs a standard
> > use might want hence the reason I put them in devel, could go either way.
> What about
> Recommends: nng-doc 
> It will make both kind of users happy.

I'd sooner just use a separate package and be done with it. I personally don't
see the point/need to move it to another package as it's all dev docs but I
don't have the time or interest to argue the point either.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/4XZ2CAIER2LYWGNPNXWA6QMQTRJ3IGH7/




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux