https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583026 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Suggestions: 1) Always install font metainfo file from respective subpackage and not from -common package. -common subpackage should be used only for common files like documentation, license to all the subpackages. 2) name this font as ektype-mukta-fonts.spec This is because this font has embedded information of manufacturer (aka foundry) as "Ek Type". And as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming we can name this as ektype-mukta-fonts 3) I will recommend that this package should obsolete existing package in Fedora ekmukta-fonts. It was published under different project name before and now it got new project name. Add in spec like this Obsoletes: ekmukta-fonts < 1.2.2-8 Provides: ekmukta-fonts = 1.2.2-8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/YQZT67SVH66OLRUUC64VOOB7SBFULW3Z/
