https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589633 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1) > - I don't think %{?_isa} is needed there: > > Requires: boost-devel%{?_isa} > Requires: gmp-devel%{?_isa} > Requires: gsl-devel%{?_isa} > Requires: libgfan-devel%{?_isa} It is. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture-specific_Dependencies. > - The -doc subpackage should be noarch Good catch. Fixed. > - cocoalib-doc.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address > /usr/share/licenses/cocoalib-doc/COPYING > > Notify upstream béout the incorrect address. Yes, and I will also notify upstream about all of the patches I had to add, just as soon as I figure out how to work upstream's bug tracker.... New URLs: Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/cocoalib/cocoalib.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/cocoalib/cocoalib-0.99563-2.fc29.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/ZOLCW6FIBCKZ25F4GBLRC75JBMYHMT7M/
