https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586324 --- Comment #7 from Pablo Rodríguez <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Scott Talbert from comment #4) > (In reply to Pablo Rodríguez from comment #2) > > Just a question about the name: why not python-mupdf? > > > > I mean, they are Python bindings for MuPDF. > > Yes...package naming is somewhat of a judgement call. Fedora guidelines > suggest sticking with the upstream name, so that is what I did. See also > the example there for PyQT4. I didn’t know that. The naming is fine. >I could also see an argument for calling the > package fitz as that's the actual module name (not sure why). I think I'll > just stick with what I've done as that was what Robert approved. See https://pymupdf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/intro/#note-on-the-name-fitz. Many thanks for your help and your excellent work, Pablo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/PJJQPZMY3RIPQ4KG7KUPGOSJDXWAEHT4/
