https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586295 --- Comment #5 from Jun Aruga <jaruga@xxxxxxxxxx> --- You need source contribution to the upstream to change the logic, don't you? ``` $ rpmlint -i ./*.spec /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm ... rubygem-bootsnap.x86_64: E: call-to-mktemp /usr/lib64/gems/ruby/bootsnap-1.3.0/bootsnap/bootsnap.so This executable calls mktemp. As advised by the manpage (mktemp(3)), this function should be avoided. Some implementations are deeply insecure, and there is a race condition between the time of check and time of use (TOCTOU). See http://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/29.html for details, and contact upstream to have this issue fixed. ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/GLS6AWKBO27YPSSGVASJ23QDVFK347OF/
