Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx 2007-09-08 19:19 EST ------- Okay, updated urls for the spec and srpm being submitted for review. Essentially the same as Dimi's upstream spec from comment 15. Spec: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.2-1/safekeep.spec SRPM: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.2-1/safekeep-1.0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm F-7 noarch RPMS: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.2-1/F7/ All remaining rpmlint errors are the result of using the /var/lib/safekeep directory as the home directory for the safekeep user and including a .ssh sub-directory for ssh keys. As previously discussed in earlier comments, these errors are erroneous for this atypical but appropriate usage of /var/lib/safekeep as a home directory. The client package is still essentially a metapackage due to the difference in the server and client dependency chain. Though as upstream has mentioned, there are plans to add additional client package payload so keeping it as a separate sub-package package now keeps from having to complicate things later as more client-side development is added. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review