Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 opensource@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From opensource@xxxxxxxxx 2007-09-06 17:22 EST ------- - rpmlint: ok W: libflaim-devel no-documentation - naming: ok - versioning: ok - license: BAD/TODO License Tag ist LGPLv2 but license is GPLv2 license text (GPLv2) is included and mentioned in source files - rpm legible: ok - source: ok url points to correct file: cbd0caf6239cffb7640391eda7551d4a libflaim-4.9.989.tar.gz cbd0caf6239cffb7640391eda7551d4a libflaim-4.9.989.tar.gz.1 - builds in mock for F7, i386 - ldconfig run: ok - directory ownage: ok - buildroot: ok - %files: no dupes and correct defattr: ok - no -static needed: ok - no libtool files: ok - .so file without suffix in devel: ok - %install and %clean with rm: ok - -devel requires of mainpackage: ok - todo before import: * add a libflaim prefix to the patch, i.e. rename it to: libflaim-permissions.patch * fix license tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review