Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-09-04 06:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Actually "vendor_id" in Fedora guidelines is only used when upstream do not > already have it... If upstream have it, then it must conform to rule about not > using a different name. But this vendor field, while mandatory with older > desktop-file-install version, is also exposed to be deprecated... > > There was a recent discution about that on the Fedora-devel mail-list: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01841.html > > But from https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01857.html it said use current guidelines. > About __doc, I use it because docs get often installed in the wrong place... But > when they are in the right place, the problem still appear because the %doc > macro take his path to begin from %{_builddir} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. So > this tweak make the %doc macros usuable on installed docs... > > For now this tweak is used for only two files, but i expect it must be checked > when final will be released. Maybe the doc content will be larger then... > > OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review