https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557371 --- Comment #36 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- In addition,. I had checked the state of atk wrapper. It is dead. So i will remove the empty packages in addition...(In reply to Jie Kang from comment #35) > A few specific rpmlint errors I would like to address: > > > ### > java-openjdk.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1:10.0.0.46-1 > ['1:10.0.0.46-7.fc27', '1:10.0.0.46-7'] > > Will the version be set to back to 1 for the package? Otherwise I'd like to > see the changelog updated appropriately. Yes it will. > > ### > java-openjdk-src.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subpackage > -> sub package, sub-package, package's > > s/subpackage/sub-package in spec file. There are 3 locations I think hmmm. As you wish. > > ### > java-openjdk-src.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C The java-openjdk-src > subpackage contains the complete OpenJDK 10 class library source code for > use by IDE indexers and debuggers. > > Fedora wants description lines to be at most 79 characters. I think you use > macros to build these. Can the description be split into multiple lines? Well why. The 79 limitation is from 1979. Yes, about 1% of people running without X may suffer, but those do not use Java. They are still on frontran. Unless you insists, I would like to keep it as it is. > > ### > ... > > Maybe: > > s/packages with debug on/debug packages > s/compressed in single archive/compressed > > Also summary has 'Documentation' while description has 'documentation'. This > should be made consistent. Prefer 'documentation', ie. not capitalized. Will be done. TY! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
