https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #84 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #81) ... > Put it simply it's RF who is the second class citizen here, not the other > way around. So it's a RF maintainer's duty to cope with the Fedora changes. I don't understand the second class citizen concept. I would more say that when a group of people helps, they should be taken with consideration and respect. Right now it's easy to install the fdk-aac codec fully backend upstream. Just enable the rpmfusion-nonfree repo and use dnf install fdk-aac What you describe simply does not exist. You are right to say that's I cannot enforce anyone from the community to work on something he doesn't like. But that argument apply to the fdk-aac reviewed plan in the first step. Because the proposal is based on "someone-else to do the complementary work", not him. And that person still do is not nominated yet. (would be welcomed) Of course bug occurring either side will have to be properly handled. My position is nothing else but: get someone to work on the complement package (even with an anonymous account). And don't expect anyone else responsibility. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
