https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562643 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- - Own %{_pkgdocdir} [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp Package otherwise approved. Fix the aforementioned issue before import. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like) BSD (3 clause)", "BSD (3 clause)", "BSD (unspecified)". 502 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-slixmpp/review-python- slixmpp/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages. Note: Package contains font files [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3-slixmpp [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-slixmpp-1.3.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm python-slixmpp-doc-1.3.0-2.fc29.noarch.rpm python-slixmpp-debugsource-1.3.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm python-slixmpp-1.3.0-2.fc29.src.rpm python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reST -> rest, re ST, re-ST python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/IoT_TestDevice.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/adhoc_provider.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/adhoc_user.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/admin_commands.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/confirm_answer.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/confirm_ask.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/custom_stanzas/custom_stanza_provider.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/custom_stanzas/custom_stanza_user.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/disco_browser.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/download_avatars.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/echo_client.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/echo_component.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/gtalk_custom_domain.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/http_over_xmpp.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/ibb_transfer/ibb_receiver.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/ibb_transfer/ibb_sender.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/mam.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/markup.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/migrate_roster.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/muc.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/ping.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/proxy_echo_client.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/pubsub_client.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/pubsub_events.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/register_account.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/roster_browser.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/rpc_async.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/rpc_client_side.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/rpc_server_side.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/s5b_transfer/s5b_receiver.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/s5b_transfer/s5b_sender.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/send_client.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/set_avatar.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/thirdparty_auth.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/user_location.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-doc.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/python-slixmpp-doc/examples/user_tune.py /usr/bin/env python3 python-slixmpp-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 36 errors, 2 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
